Let’s End Cancer Military Metaphors

Health Tips / Let’s End Cancer Military Metaphors

The first notable use of illness described in military terms actually came from John Donne, the 16th century “No man is an island” poet. He described his terminal illness as a “cannon shot” and a “siege that blows up the heart.” In 1864, Louis Pasteur (probably trying to get government funding for his research) used invasion imagery to introduce his new germ theory to the French public. And in 1971, President Nixon publicly declared “war” on cancer, calling it a “relentless and insidious enemy.”

And now, for more than 40 years, when you or a friend or a loved one gets a cancer diagnosis, out trot all sorts of war clichés as “the battle begins.” Your cancer is an evil entity that invaded your body. Your team of doctor/soldiers provides the big guns: surgery, chemo, and radiation therapy. Your surgeon (who could be John Wayne under that mask) confidently says, “Looks like we got it all.” But later that same day, during the second part of the classic one-two punch, your oncologist or radiation therapist proposes what sounds like a scorched-earth approach to “wipe out every last cancer cell.”

Your friends talk about how you’re doing in your battle with cancer, putting up the good fight.

One writer, a consultant to the pharmaceutical industry, in an essay entitled “Military Strategies Used in the War on Cancer,” rather imaginatively separated the different phases of cancer treatment into military maneuvers. Surgery, he felt, could be compared to aerial bombardment and artillery fire, ensuring all enemy troops are killed and removed. By comparison, radiation and chemotherapy recalled the poison gas attacks of World War I (interestingly, a poison gas used then was nitrogen mustard, which later became one of the first cancer chemotherapies). He then gets more sophisticated: the newer enzyme-inhibitor drugs, such as Gleevec for leukemia, will “slow the enemy’s advance.”

Finally, the newest cancer cell-specific monoclonal antibodies (Rituxan) and antibody-drug conjugates (Adcetris) he likens to Navy Seals teams and smart bombs.

Mind-body approach

If you’re into mind-body medicine, you’ll find plenty of creative visualizations originally created by the late Dr. O. Carl Simonton, MD. They encourage you to view your cancer cells as “weak, confused invaders,” and guide you to “mobilize your army of strong white blood cells to attack and destroy your cancer.”

Our current visualization guru is Belleruth Naparstek. Her CD, A Meditation to Help You Fight Cancer, “shows how to cope with cancer with a narrative that imagines tumors shrinking and fighter cells battling and triumphing over cancer cells as a protective cushion of love and support surrounds the listener.”

Outside your window, friends and colleagues, fists held high, pink ribbons fluttering in the breeze, are marching against cancer. Unfortunately, too much of the money raised is directed to more and more chemotherapy, too little toward prevention.

And then, of course, if you’re defeated you’ll be remembered as a good soldier, losing your long battle against cancer, but putting up a good fight to the end.

“Be ready to fight”

This Health Tip was prompted by a small but interesting article published in the British Medical Journal responding to ads created by the fundraising drive of Cancer Research UK (CRUK). This well intentioned organization declared on billboards throughout the UK: “Be full of hope. Be courageous. Be ready to fight,” adding it was “determined to beat cancer.” In press releases, CRUK referred to its cancer research funds as a “war chest,” to some of its work as “recruiting viruses for cancer battle,” and to transforming  fundraising women in pink into an “army who run, dance, and sing.”

CRUK’s ad agency apparently admitted all this was “designed to have cancer quaking in its rubbish boots.” (And, no, despite considering myself widely read I don’t know what “rubbish boots” actually are.)

Essayist Susan Sontag (who herself had breast cancer) wrote about this in her now-classic Illness as Metaphor. Metaphors, she felt, created prejudice. A cancer survivor is a winner, the dying victim a loser. The military metaphors surrounding cancer ultimately confer blame on the victim for not fighting hard enough. But many people, she felt, aren’t by nature fighters. She wondered if a poorly chosen metaphor could make these peaceful souls feel responsible for both their cancer and their fate.

Another brilliant writer with breast cancer, feminist Barbara Ehrenreich, has written of her contempt for the cheery world of corporate-sponsored, pink-ribbon festivities. She, too, decries the endless victim language connected to breast cancer and the nonstop positive attitude among doctors, an approach that leaves little room for the patient to express the normal emotions of fear, shock, isolation, and sadness. For some powerful writing, try her Welcome to Cancerland website.

British writer and inveterate unapologetic smoker Jenny Diski relates in this month’s London Review of Books what went through her mind when she learned she had inoperable lung cancer. In this masterful article,  Diski concludes with:

“One thing I state as soon as we’re out of the door (of her doctor’s office): Under no circumstances is anyone to say that I lost a battle with cancer. Or that I bore it bravely. I am not fighting, losing, winning or bearing. I will not personify the cancer cells inside me in any form. I reject all metaphors of attack or enmity in the midst, and will have nothing whatever to do with any notion of desert, punishment, fairness or unfairness, or any kind of moral causality.”

So what this boils down to is that unless you really like the military metaphor, it’s time to shed it when it comes to cancer. It’s potentially harmful to those who have enough on their minds without being reminded by their oncologist-generals and pink-ribboned fellow troupers to be strong soldiers and keep up the good fight.

In my own opinion, the military metaphor was a mistake from the start because it implies an enemy to do battle against. But is “cancer” one unique enemy for us to do battle against? Cancer is not ISIS. Cancer is a multiplicity of diseases with a variety of causes, a variety of clinical presentations, and a variety of (often very successful, life-extending) treatments. Because of this, there will be no single “cure” for cancer in which cancer becomes, like the bubonic plague, an interesting historical event. Cancer is an incredibly complex puzzle.

You don’t wage war against puzzles. You solve them.

Be well,
David Edelberg, MD

0 thoughts on “Let’s End Cancer Military Metaphors

    It might be that the military metaphors in medicine are not metaphors at all, but words directly introduced into the cancer research/political arena by the military!

    B Jones
    Posted July 26, 2016 at 10:16 am

    Military metaphors are overused in the case of war, too. We need to see each other as fellow humans.

    Posted September 19, 2014 at 9:12 pm

    War metaphors permeate American language and culture. War on poverty; war on drugs; cold war; war without end on terrorism. President Obama labeled ISIS “a cancer,” as did Ronald Reagan in referring to the Nicaraguan Sandinistas in the 1980’s. “War rooms” can be found in corporate offices and law firms, not just the Pentagon. Injured veterans are wounded warriors. And of course, political campaigns are “waged, won, and lost” with strategists, “war chests,” and foot soldiers. Thank you, Dr. David, for another compelling look at wellness, disease, and healing without the burden of war imagery.

    MaryLou Carroll
    Posted September 19, 2014 at 8:27 pm

    So True…

    But the only thing is… It is not just a puzzle to be “solved” it is something to be HEALED. Not just a puzzle to be “solved”. 🙂

    People that are put in a loving compassionate space are known to recover have been shown to heal much better and faster than people in just “clinical” medical scenarios. The reason for that is because if the person is holding negative things in their mind – their immune system, hormonal/endocrine system is all affected by that on the physical side of things… and that affects recovery. Like you said in your article — you alluded to it — that removing these “military” words, connotations, metaphors from the vocabulary are crucial — absolutely correct. What you are also saying is eliminate all negative words and wording from the healing practice. By putting those “military” words as you call them you do create negativity by creating “war” and “enemy” etc.. etc.. The worst thing of that mentality is that it takes the patient AWAY from the most important thing of healing and recovery which is move to a healthy healing loving state… 🙂 In healthy healing loving states MASSIVE physiological changes have been seen, noted, and studied in people >> Most common in the area of healing people from addictions, physical and mental trauma and healing PTSD ( Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) When people are in a healthy healing loving state = Great and Big things happen. 🙂 People have to be willing to also deal with they physiological aspects of it all for true recovery. 🙂 Some doctors don’t want to hear that… because they are very arrogant. They think they only need themselves — no other doctors, no nurses, probably not even the patients themselves. haha.. But everyone knows those ‘doctors’ – they are not True Doctors. 🙂 Real Doctors know the value of a healthy loving “field/area/environment” that the patient must be in and be placed in. 😀

    As you said to eliminate the war slang and mentality from the picture is very very true and very very wise and intuitive. The reason for that is because LANGUAGE is ACTUALLY PROGRAMMING. It can “Program” people and is a bunch of ‘self-talk’ that people have in their heads. That “self-talk” creates feelings, emotions, and other thoughts – which can also in turn create even more thoughts and feelings… And of course if those feelings and thoughts are negative it creates a ton of other negative feedback loops and effects.

    So the solution is to not just eliminate the ‘battle’ mentality words – but to also REPLACE it with a loving healthy healing one. Cheers and GOD Bless! 🙂

    Posted September 16, 2014 at 1:37 pm

    Excellent health tip! The military metaphors for cancer have always troubled me as well. Such metaphors greatly limit the ways we can go about solving the puzzle. Thank you, Dr. Edelberg.

    John Pearson
    Posted September 16, 2014 at 12:21 pm

    We definitely need a big paradigm shift to get away from the idea of “there is always an enemy.” It’s present in nearly all aspects of our existence and in how we handle disease as you point out. I struggled at the beginning of your article on how to conceptualize the battle with cancer another way. I like the puzzle approach. It’s not hostile and it says we have the opportunity to do something about it instead of just resign ourselves to some inexplicable, irrational, evil force like how we handle our political/military enemies. Great and provocative post Dr E! Much appreciated!

    Posted September 16, 2014 at 10:59 am

    Hear, Hear, Dr. E! Good Lord, I roll my eyes every time I hear so and so “lost her battle to cancer”. I thought it was just me feeling absolutely beside myself whenever I hear the metaphors “the struggle”, “the battle”, “waged war”. Feh! Please, I feel it requires a more gentler, softer, conscious approach. Thanks for the post, my friend.

    Dr. David W Bailey, DC
    Posted September 16, 2014 at 8:24 am

    This is an excellent article and once again Dr. Edelberg shows his compassion and intellect. My son is taking a medical narrative class at Vanderbilt and I sent this along to share with his professor.

    Posted September 16, 2014 at 8:03 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *