Conventional Medicine Bashes Supplements (Again)

Health Tips / Conventional Medicine Bashes Supplements (Again)

Posted 12/24/2013

The nutritional supplement industry took a few body blows this month from conventional medicine, with several reports published in the Annals of Internal Medicine regarding the effectiveness of daily vitamins and minerals. An accompanying editorial urged physicians to discourage their patients from taking supplements altogether. Moreover, the editorial suggested the government should stop funding research in this area.

As if it’s over…proven…the end.

In reality, mega-medicine has been waffling over nutritional supplements for as long as I can recall. For a few years, you’d see nothing but hostile articles in conventional medical journals, then a glimmer of hope (“antioxidants prevent heart disease”), and then more bashing before another glimmer (“vitamin D prevents cancer”). These sea changes aren’t necessarily a bad state of affairs. They show that even conventional physicians are willing to shift perspective if presented with evidence.

Keep in mind that 30 years ago acupuncturists and midwives were arrested in Illinois for practicing medicine without a license. Now they’re ensconced in virtually every medical center. As recently as five years ago, fibromyalgia wasn’t recognized as a condition and antibiotics were routinely recommended for all cases of bronchitis. Things can and do change.

But the general hostility from conventional medicine toward nutritional supplements and the indifference of most physicians to learning anything about nutritional medicine merits some thought.

Personally, I see it as a control issue

If you’re reading about supplements, discussing them with non-MD caregivers (like chiropractors, naturopaths, and nutritionists), and making your own choices you’re taking charge of your health and well-being.  Sad to say, that’s generally not encouraged in conventional physician settings.

If you review the historical arc of American medicine, you’ll see an unwavering attitude that pretty much states “we’ll handle everything.” This has meant the politically controlled suppression by state licensing of homeopaths, chiropractors, naturopaths, and other alternative healers that exists to this day. (These practitioners are not permitted to have hospital admission privileges or to be taught pharmacology in order to write prescriptions. Most are still forbidden from practicing in many states.) It has also meant generally discouraging and disparaging your attempts at self-care by reading books on health, following a specific diet that you’ve found works best for you, and taking nutritional supplements and herbs.

Enter “vitamins are useless” articles like the one above. The more you’re presented with official-sounding data that erodes your confidence in self-care, the more you’ll relinquish yourself to the seriously dysfunctional US health care system. And that means the more you’ll rely on surgery, prescription drugs, and health insurance.

For decades, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has been salivating to take control of the supplement industry, making access available only by doctor’s prescription.

What the supplements study failed to report

The Annals study did not mention that surveys show regular supplement users consistently report their overall health status as “excellent” or “very good.” To me, this means they’re using supplements as part of a broader healthful lifestyle that includes a good diet, regular exercise, and stress reduction. When a person starts a supplement program, it’s often as part of an overall resolution to get healthier. And if you accomplish that very admirable goal, you won’t need doctors as often (good for you, bad for physician income).

People also use supplements to treat specific health problems before resorting to prescription drugs. Here the overall evidence is quite strong. Physician Alan Gaby’s textbook Nutritional Medicine, a million-word cat-crusher of a tome, details 400 medical conditions treatable by vitamins and herbs and backed by 15,000 references from the medical literature.

Should you, as the Annals editorial suggests, simply stop taking supplements? I wouldn’t recommend it for my patients and I guarantee that within a year some further studies will appear somewhere in world medical literature that show supplements are beneficial and that this particular US study was flawed.

Less than a year ago, for example, a huge study reported a lower cancer incidence among men taking supplements. Two years ago, early all-cause mortality (medical-speak for early death) was lower among supplement users. Neither of these studies was mentioned in this recent Annals flurry or in the accompanying editorial.  Being selective with your data, as these researchers appear to have done, is called “cherry picking.” Pharmaceutical companies routinely cherry-pick the clinical studies they submit to the FDA when trying to get approval for a new drug, choosing the good while pushing the bad toward the back of someone’s desk drawer.

My advice on supplements…and OTC drugs too

Use common sense when choosing supplements. I can assure you most are not magic bullets, but many are plenty helpful, and even more so when used with the self-care mentioned above. How do you decipher beneficial supplements from the over-hyped and potentially dangerous? If your own doctor isn’t as well-informed about supplements as you’d like, consult a chiropractor, naturopath or clinical nutritionist.

A real doozy of a nutritional supplement scare article appeared in Sunday’s New York Times.  If you read “Spike in Harm to Liver Is Tied to Dietary Aids” uncritically, you might run screaming from your supplements. In actual fact, the number of reported cases of serious liver damage is extremely small (845 cases from 2004 to 2012, with a notable increase from 2010 to 2012) considering the number of pills Americans swallow every year.

Almost hidden in the article was the acknowledgement that investigators had focused on cases where a drug or supplement could be blamed with a high degree of certainty. Drug? DRUG? Why, then, is the article not entitled “Spike in Harm to Liver Is Tied to Drugs”?

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) has surpassed viral hepatitis as the number one reason people require liver transplants. Yes, you read that correctly. The NYT piece mentions DILIN, an acronym for “drug-induced liver injury network,” where liver specialists report causes of liver failure. If you link to the website, you’ll discover the reported enemies to your liver–in addition to Tylenol–are almost all prescription drugs.

No thanks to the New York Times for smart, fair, and accurate reporting.

Be well,
David Edelberg, MD

0 thoughts on “Conventional Medicine Bashes Supplements (Again)

    It would help a lot if the suppplement industry went through an approval process with the FDA.

    mimi harris
    Posted December 28, 2013 at 3:15 pm

    Hi Margo
    I would let your doctor know about he supplements you’re taking–just for the reason you gave–so that he knows about potentials of drug interactions.
    That said, don’t expect enthusiasm or encouragement. Expect instead a stern look and an answer something like “Well, probably not a good idea. I don’t know anything about what you’re taking.” Of course, Heaven forbid he should take a few minutes to learn about those supplements–it’s quicker for him to discourage their use–and erode your confidence in the process. The irony of all this is that when surveyed, it turns out that the majority of physicians take supplements (especially antioxidants) themselves.

    Dr E
    Posted December 26, 2013 at 4:47 pm

    General question for Dr. E — concerning your patients who do take nutritional supplements (since many do) — when these patients are visiting a “conventional” doctor for the first time, should they be totally honest and disclose all supplements they are taking, even when such disclosure is likely to earn the patient disapproval, or even incorrect diagnoses, from their new doctor? (Remembering, of course, that under certain insurance plans, or in rural areas, “doctor shopping” for more accepting physicians isn’t always a possibility.) Or is it better to keep mum? Or, just disclose those, such as fish oil, might have interactions with prescription drugs?

    Margo Milde
    Posted December 26, 2013 at 11:36 am

    This new “study” is the usual deceptive anti-vitamin propaganda. The anti-bashing arguments and “scientific studies” are little more than distortions of the true facts. The medical orthodoxy, along with their sponsored mass media, have been telling the public distortions and lies about the benefits of supplements for decades. Just see how widely this “news” has been broadcast by the popular media, unlike positive news on vitamins. And they do it not just blatantly but by intentionally designing scientific “studies” to fail vitamins.

    The propaganda culture never stop spewing out disinformation on supplements so most people believe this misinformation instead of checking things out a bit more for themselves. For a worthwhile article revealing many of this misleading hype by both the popular media and the medical establishment google/bing “2 Big Lies: No Vitamin Benefits & Supplements Are Very Dangerous by Rolf Hefti”

    Posted December 24, 2013 at 2:37 pm

    Caveat Emptor. “Let the buyer beware” ought to be firmly in place before believing anything you’re told or read from ANY source.

    Don Schoenbeck
    Posted December 24, 2013 at 10:00 am

    I was in a research program at the National Institutes of Health, our government research program, and got ‘kicked out’ because of being severely mentally ill from taking herbal supplements. They caused my wide mood swings which were labeled as bi-polar. [I’m also psychotic and have no friends.] Traditional sections of NIH don’t want people to heal. Think of the money lost if people no longer have to take lots of drugs or need surgery. Who in the medical establishment wants this ‘golden cow’ to stop producing?

    It was established in three interviews at Whole Health Chicago with Dr. Larry Stoler that I’m not mentally ill but am energy healing and that is not recognized by the Western Medical Establishment.

    Carol Ring
    Posted December 24, 2013 at 7:31 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *