2265 North Clybourn Avenue    Chicago, IL 60614    P: 773.296.6700     F: 773.296.1131

What’s Your Risk? Breast Cancer in the News Again

I was pleasantly surprised to learn how much damage occurred at the Susan G. Komen Foundation in response to its astonishingly wrong-headed decision to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood. Women (and smart men) around the country were rightly outraged that money earmarked for the breast cancer screening of low-income women–not for family planning or abortion–had been blocked by the highly paid executives at Komen.

There was some talk that Komen’s CEO, Nancy Brinker, a powerful Republican party backer, was stepping down, but this was not the case. In fact, she got the board to bump up her annual salary 64% to $684,000.

Former Komen executive and vocal pro-life advocate Karen Handel, who was responsible for spearheading the Planned Parenthood cut-off, is now running for the Senate.

But the damage to Komen has been done. Donations are down by nearly 40%, the three-day walk on Washington has been officially cancelled for 2014, and races in seven other major cities, including Chicago, have been cancelled for lack of participation. Although Komen blames the economy for this precipitous decline, other organizations (like the Avon walk, American Cancer Society, and Planned Parenthood) haven’t seen any substantial revenue changes.

Stoking fear
Before the Planned Parenthood debacle, my issue with the Komen Foundation and similar charity organizations that focus on a single disease was they’re all a bit too alarmist. The fear they’ve managed to stoke in women didn’t match the statistics.

Although I’m certainly not arguing that breast cancer isn’t a significant health issue, it seemed that all the hoopla, ribbons, t-shirts, and funny hats were supporting a single disease and those who profit from it—oncologists, radiation therapists, cancer hospitals, and the pharmaceutical industry. Yet when I look at photos of a Komen event, I mainly see white women, the very group that actually has a lower breast cancer risk than black, Hispanic, or Asian women.

Women’s awareness of their breast cancer risk was the subject of a paper presented just last Saturday and published online. It turns out that most women, 90% in fact, are simply wrong when asked about their own personal risk of developing the disease. Of these 90%, fully half overestimate their risk. These were generally the white, pink-ribbon group, and as they tried to be proactive in regard to breast cancer likely spent a lot of unnecessary worry time, with too many mammograms, too much struggle with breast self-examination, and far too many negative breast biopsies.

The other half, the “under-estimators” of breast cancer risk, are mainly black, Hispanic, and Asian women, who did not get the screening they needed and deserved. And their situation was not helped as Komen cut funding to Planned Parenthood. The numbers are interesting: 45% of women overestimate their breast cancer risk, 45% underestimate, and just 10% get it right.

What’s your risk?
It’s fairly straightforward to approximate your personal lifetime risk for developing breast cancer. Here’s a link to a brief risk assessment tool. After you’ve walked through it we’ll move on to the new recommendations for breast cancer screening and prevention. For the many patients who have asked me about this, a history of using birth control pills does not–repeat not–increase your breast cancer risk.

Here’s the latest in breast cancer screening
The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is recommending sweeping changes in its breast cancer screening guidelines, as follows:

  • Routine screening of average-risk women should begin at      age 50, instead of 40.
  • Routine screening should end at age 74.
  • Women should get screening mammograms every two years      instead of every year.
  • Breast self-exams have little value, based on the findings      of several large studies.

These recommendations weren’t universally agreed upon by all physicians and were most vocally opposed by radiologists, who, in the name of “patient safety,” could anticipate a big income loss with this drop in mammogram traffic.

I emphasize to my patients that the guidelines aren’t written in stone. If you feel a suspicious lump, you should definitely act on it. If you have a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, consider getting tested for the BRCA gene and mammograms should definitely begin in your 40s. What everyone does agree on: don’t bother with the monthly breast self-exams that continue to be recommended by some organizations.

On to breast cancer prevention
Here’s what we know:

  • Women who smoke are at increased risk.
  • Women who drink more than one or two drinks daily are at risk.
  • Being overweight increases your risk.
  • Regular aerobic exercise decreases your risk.
  • Breastfeeding may (but won’t necessarily) decrease your risk.
  • Exposure to radiation and environmental pollutants increases your risk (you’ll be wise to reduce the number of MRIs you have and avoid excessive exposure to exhaust fumes).
  • Low vitamin D levels increase breast cancer risk. Taking 2,000 IU daily will reduce risk.

Here are a few more ideas that seem to be panning out as good preventive measures:

  • Eating a diet rich in high-antioxidant fresh fruits and vegetables.
  • Eating a diet low in saturated (animal-based) fats.
  • The following foods contain ingredients that (at least in the laboratory) have specific cancer-preventing and cancer-fighting properties: broccoli, curcumin (turmeric), garlic, green tea, fish, apples, berries, soybeans, pomegranates, walnuts, flaxseed, and orange fruits and vegetables.
  • Calcium D-glucarate has undergone no human studies to date, but has been shown to prevent breast and other cancers in lab animals. Several of the active ingredients listed above, including Calcium D glucarate, can be found in Healthy Cells Breast, available in our apothecary.

Be well,
David Edelberg, MD


Posted in B, Blog, Knowledge Base, W Tagged with: , , , , ,
5 comments on “What’s Your Risk? Breast Cancer in the News Again
  1. Diane Engelhardt says:

    I had breast cancer in 2009 and the year before that hyperplasia on my other breast. The hardest part for me is trying not to worry every day of a recurrence. After a lumpectomy chemo and radiation I cannot feel my breast and know anymore what is normal and what isn’t. My cancer was under my breast on the chest wall discovered by me a month after my mammogram. This organization is just a money machine, for the people in it. It may have started with good intent but greed has gotten the best of it. Thanks for another great article. I will continue to donate my funds to other organizations who have less overhead in big salaries and more going to research. Thanks Doctor!! Diane age 56

  2. Margo says:

    It’s no secret that Komen has long taken organizational policy positions that are not in the best health care interests of women with breast cancer (or women in general). Dr E’s criticism of them is nothing new. Having read much on this issue, IMHO in many ways, Komen is not much more than a corporate representative of Big Pharma, and simply does not have any interest in promoting the non-drug pro-prevention strategies Dr. E recommends. For a fascinating, if slightly dated, comprehensive expose on this topic, see the article “The Marketing of Breast Cancer” by Mary Ann Swissler, who studied in detail the politics and finances of the Komen organization:

  3. Stephanie says:

    I tried the risk assessment tool, responding with the answers that were true when I was 38 (I’m 48 now). The tool indicates that my 5-year risk and lifetime risk for invasive breast cancer would be 0.5% and 11.2% respectively (the latter lower than the ‘average woman’ lifetime risk of 12.4%). At age 39, I found a breast lump (~0.5 cm) that was not detectable by subsequent ultrasound, mammogram or MRI. Doctors (at an NCI designated comprehensive cancer center) told me for nine months that it was nothing to be concerned about and that I didn’t need a biopsy. I finally decided to get the biopsy and it was DCIS–the doctors said ‘this mustcome out right away!’ (and did not understand why I didn’t trust them anymore). After two lumpectomies, I had a single mastectomy with negative sentinal nodes. All at age 39. I’m caucasian and thought breast cancer was something that happened to other people–was not worried about it nor vigilant. With no perceived risk and the above recommendations that screening start at age 50, I wonder what the stage of this would’ve been if I’d started screening at 50.

  4. Jennifer says:

    Just a quick little comment regarding the recommendation to decrease exposure to radiation–as and X-ray Tech, I can safely say that an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) does NOT use radiation. Perhaps this was a typo and you really meant CT (Computed Tomography)?

  5. Nancy Rose says:

    I am surprised to hear you caution against the use of MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging involves no ionizing radiation, only radio waves. You probably mean x-rays and CT, Computerized Tomography. I wrote two books on imaging for Oldendorf, the neurologist who first experimented with x-ray tomography.

Leave a Comment

In Archive

Quick Connect

Get One Click Access to our


The Knowledge Base


Patient education is an integral part of our practice. Here you will find a comprehensive collection of staff articles, descriptions of therapies and nutritional supplements, information addressing your health concerns, and the latest research on nutritional supplements and alternative therapies.

Join our Newsletter

Get health recommendations, delicious and time-saving recipes, medical news, supplement reviews, birthday discounts, and more!


Upcoming Workshops

The Next Lyme Academy Begins
Tuesday, October 4, 5:30-7 pm
Here’s a special invitation for patients of Dr. Kelley who are currently being treated for Lyme disease. Dr. Kelley’s new, four-week Lyme Academy starts on October 4, continuing over the following three Tuesdays.


Awakened Body, Quiet Mind
An innovative workshop series for relieving mind/body stress and tapping into your true power and natural health.
4 Group Sessions with Meghan Roekle, PsyD
Four meetings using a unique combination of embodiment meditation and mental inquiry for deep healing.
Thursdays from 6:00-8:00pm; beginning October 20th

Recent Health Tips

  • Invasion of the Body Snatchers!

    Invasion of the Body Snatchers!

    I’d been reading Ally Hilfiger’s new autobiography Bite Me: How Lyme Disease Stole My Childhood, Made Me Crazy, and Almost Killed Me, preferring the Lyme parts to those devoted to fashion and her MTV “Rich Girl” series. Her symptoms were typical of chronic Lyme and …Read More »
  • Making It Easier To Say No To Statins

    Making It Easier To Say No To Statins

    Patients and doctors alike are understandably nervous about taking/prescribing any of the cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins. You as a patient especially don’t want to hear “You’ll be on this pill for the rest of your life.” And if you’ve followed some of the recent …Read More »

October Sale: 20% Off Urban Moonshine Products


All Urban Moonshine products are 20% off for the entire month of October!

Urban Moonshine creates beautiful herbal formulas that focus on prevention, improving quality of life, and empowering people to create home herbal apothecaries.  More>>